It wasn't cost grounds at all...it was much simpler for dentists especially with kids. There was always a very real risk of death associated with it...your parents would have had to sign a consent form acknowledging this risk each time. GA of any kind is much safer in a hospital environment. Apparently the more scared the patient is, the higher the risk too.
I don't think dentists howeverthey are, actually go into dentistry to kill their patients, in-surgery GA meant that one day they could kill someone conceivably (a bit stressful) and there were some who never offered it for this very reason including a practice I went to.....this meant they worked on making their local injections comfortable even in those days...they would refer people out who insisted they wanted it, as I did at age 12 but that referral out was actually one of my better experiences of it. By age 14 for further orthodontic extractions I chose just TLC and LA.
There are some other threads on this which include some of the stats but trust me as a mum you really don't want your 4 year old dying from a tooth extraction when it can be done painlessly with just local by the right dentist. http://www.dentalfearcentral.org/for...ead.php?t=1287




they are, actually go into dentistry to kill their patients, in-surgery GA meant that one day they could kill someone conceivably (a bit stressful) and there were some who never offered it for this very reason including a practice I went to.....this meant they worked on making their local injections comfortable even in those days...they would refer people out who insisted they wanted it, as I did at age 12 but that referral out was actually one of my better experiences of it. By age 14 for further orthodontic extractions I chose just TLC and LA.
Reply With Quote
.
.



