P
Poppy1234
taking a break from the forum
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2010
- Messages
- 261
- Location
- Sheffield and Stockport, UK.
Decay seen 5 years ago, no action taken by dentist..??
Hello all.
Five years ago I thought a wisdom tooth at the back looked a bit discoloured, & thought that might indicate the start of decay.
I pointed it out to my dentist, but he said it was fine.
I pointed it out a further 10 times, every six months, but he always said it was fine, but never bothered x-raying it.
Now he's finally x-rayed it today, & there IS a problem with it. Said it WAS decayed & needs a filling.
So why didn't he say so 5 years ago instead of leaving it to get worse?
Why do they say go to the dentist every 6 months to check on decay if they just ignore it for 5 years!
As it's got no worse at all in 5 years, then why does it need treatment now anyway?
And does it?
It appears to me to have this "arrested caries" I've heard about, where the decay stops.
It must have, or tooth would have gone bad in 5 years, surely??
It looks the same now as back then, it's only now he's bothered x-raying it. He said 6 months ago he'd x-ray it, then said he "didn't have time". So it just got ignored & ignored.
Why has a decaying tooth been left for so long? Anyone got any ideas??
I don't have a phobia, but don't want an unnecessary filling done. If it's been the same for 5 years, I wonder if it really needs a filling??
(Considering I eat no sweet stuff at all & clean my teeth all the time, I don't see how I can get ANY decay anyway....I'm baffled as to how I could have prevented this.)
Thanks.
Hello all.
Five years ago I thought a wisdom tooth at the back looked a bit discoloured, & thought that might indicate the start of decay.
I pointed it out to my dentist, but he said it was fine.
I pointed it out a further 10 times, every six months, but he always said it was fine, but never bothered x-raying it.
Now he's finally x-rayed it today, & there IS a problem with it. Said it WAS decayed & needs a filling.
So why didn't he say so 5 years ago instead of leaving it to get worse?
Why do they say go to the dentist every 6 months to check on decay if they just ignore it for 5 years!
As it's got no worse at all in 5 years, then why does it need treatment now anyway?
And does it?
It appears to me to have this "arrested caries" I've heard about, where the decay stops.
It must have, or tooth would have gone bad in 5 years, surely??
It looks the same now as back then, it's only now he's bothered x-raying it. He said 6 months ago he'd x-ray it, then said he "didn't have time". So it just got ignored & ignored.
Why has a decaying tooth been left for so long? Anyone got any ideas??
I don't have a phobia, but don't want an unnecessary filling done. If it's been the same for 5 years, I wonder if it really needs a filling??
(Considering I eat no sweet stuff at all & clean my teeth all the time, I don't see how I can get ANY decay anyway....I'm baffled as to how I could have prevented this.)
Thanks.